Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
> Not yet not yet :)
> 
> What we're talking here is the next generation of languages for Player 8.5
> and Flash 9+. ActionScript2 will still be the best language for developing
> Flash for maybe a little less than one year, and MTASC is still the best AS2
> compiler available.

No, but for many of us we must already start to plan our future 
development workflow and potentially factor out the use of MTASC altogether.

Since I doubt very much that a copy of the Flash IDE will be bundled 
with Flex2, and as far as I am aware we have not yet been told whether 
the Flash IDE will in future include a command line compiler, those 
developers who don't have money to burn will be forced to revert back to 
the pre-MTASC process of compiling (very slowly) within the Flash IDE.

Of course we have the option of sticking with AS2 forever (not 
desirable) or learning a new language and breaking compatibility with 
ActionScript, but in my world this is not really an option for many 
reasons.  Firstly, it will be incredibly difficult to justify the use of 
a different language (that mostly only open source flash developers will 
know) when providing source code for a project to a client.  It will 
just be too difficult for the client to hire future developers to 
maintain a project.  Secondly, it is currently possible to 
"dual-compile" in Eclipse with MTASC and with the Flash IDE, giving us 
developers the ability to remain working in Eclipse, but to deliver the 
client a standard Flash project (*.fla, *.as).  This will no longer be 
an option.

So you see, in my world MTASC is already dead :(

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to