hank, I totaly agree and feel you have no need to appoligise. IMO Ocaml is NOT the reason why MTASC is fast and agree MM's compiler is slow because of its evolution/heritage.
For the record... Nicolas wrote: > I think you should learn about compilers before being confident while > stating such things. and Luke Hubbard wrote: > I think you are missing the point about OCaml. One of the reasons mtasc is so > fast AFAIK is its > written in OCaml. If a new AS3 compiler was written in another language it > may not have > the same speed advantage we currently have with MTASC. Also for the record, I feel Nicolas has achieved a great feat in developing MTASC and I just want to find a) a way to keep an OS AS compiler activly developed and b) for it not to be wholey developed by one person and c) if a and b can be met I will help as much as possible. _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
