I may be wrong, but I don´t see any big differences on yours application´s code when you use the patched classes as the patch is only intended to make them compile with MTASC.
Marcelo. Stefan Richter wrote: >I agree. This 'issue' is one that stops me from using tools such as MTASC >and Flashdevelop more often. > >Stefan > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Peters >>Sent: 26 December 2005 21:17 >>To: 'Open Source Flash Mailing List' >>Subject: Re: [osflash] FlashDevelop: Project build and -mx parameter >> >> >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcelo de Moraes >>>Serpa >>>Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 1:53 PM >>>To: Open Source Flash Mailing List >>>Subject: Re: [osflash] FlashDevelop: Project build and -mx parameter >>> >>>Have you considered applying the v2 patch avaiable @ osflash.org? >>> >>> >>> >>I have, but I'm kind of wary of that. That puts my code base >>out of sync with everyone else who has Flash. I do work for >>different companies and they need to be able to compile my >>code as-is. Not realistic to force them all to apply a patch. >> >>The mx classes may be buggy, but even so, they are a "standard". >> >>Keith >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>osflash mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org >> >> >> > > >_______________________________________________ >osflash mailing list >[email protected] >http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > _______________________________________________________ Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage. http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
