On 8/30/06, Chris Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/30/06, Scott Hyndman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to look into how Eclipse handles > > this? We don't need to define an interface, we just need to build to > > one. > > > > I've been starting to build some little Eclipse plugins, and let me > > tell you, it handles a ton of stuff so you don't have to. > > > I totally agree with this Scott. This is one of the biggest advantages > that Eclipse has going for it. I don't think we need another API. > What's wrong with using ANTLR for this? >
Nothing is wrong with ANTLR. But as I understand it, ANTLR is a building block for the solution, not the solution. Martin Scnabel (ASDT author) discusses ANTLR issues earlier in this thread. Regards Hank _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
