So this could be an interesting and appealing solution for a new wiki 
philosophy and improving the current osflash site :).

João Saleiro

hank williams wrote:
>
> On 9/5/06, *Martin Heidegger* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Well ... I bet Mozillas rendering engine is faster than maybe
>     everything
>     to be done in flash.
>
>
> Lets just say that's true.
>
> Graphical word processors were not as fast as character display based 
> word processors. Nevertheless, WYSIWIG won the battle.
>
> The question with any new application is whether it does something 
> that makes it substantially more useful than what came before. That is 
> the challenge of product design - to do things that make us more 
> productive. Rendering in 1/10th of a second instead of 1/20th of a 
> second is probably not as important as making something that is more 
> useful.
>
> My thesis is that great new tools allow us to do more than just make 
> us go 10% faster. They allow us to be 100% more productive. The 
> challenge is, of course, finding those opportunities. But I never 
> discount the possibility of finding them. Particularly at this early 
> stage in the lifecycle of our new tools.
>
> Personally, I suspect the interesting opportunity is in how we can 
> access the information and how the tools can allow us to use new 
> visualization techniques to find and explore information. In another 
> entirely different space, Apple's new Time Machine backup program is a 
> compelling example of using new graphical tools to visualize data in a 
> new way, greatly enhancing productivity. A pure text display might 
> draw faster on the screen. But who cares?
>
> Regards,
> Hank
>  
>
>     But you have a chance if you set a FIX set of things
>     to be rendered - less flexible.
>
>     yours
>     Martin.
>
>     2006/9/5, Chris Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
>
>         Claus,
>
>         I was just going to say the same thing. ;-) Flash could just
>         read the
>         XMTML and display it. The possibilites are endless; I can
>         certainly
>         imagine quite a few cool things being done with this, even though
>         Flash isn't supposed to do Wikis ;-)
>
>         -Chris
>
>         On 9/5/06, Claus Wahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>         <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>         > Arnoud Bos wrote:
>         >
>         > > Yeah and we like to be found…
>         > > Google and flash are still not best friends
>         >
>         > There are techniques you can use to solve that, google for
>         "seffs". I
>         > already have two sites in production that use those
>         techniques and it
>         > works like a charm.
>         >
>         > The idea is to work on XHTML documents and just layer Flash
>         on top of
>         > them, in a way that Flash is the view of the data contained
>         in the XHTML
>         > documents (think CSS gone nuts).
>         >
>         > This way you can unobtrusively deliver Flash to those who can
>         see it,
>         > and deliver XHTML to the rest (including search engine bots),
>         without
>         > much risk of pagerank punishment as the data displayed will
>         be identical.
>         >
>         > I could imagine a Wiki (and a lot of other things) in Flash
>         (9) to work
>         > pretty well with that technique.
>         >
>         > Cheers,
>         > Claus.
>         >
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > osflash mailing list
>         > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>         > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>         <http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org>
>         >
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         osflash mailing list
>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>         http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     ICQ: 117662935
>     Skype: mastakaneda
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     osflash mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>   

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to