nevermind ;) it would be cool if you could prove it.
yours
Martin.
2006/9/5, hank williams <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ok, well as I said in one of my previous emails, I think the example of the Apple Time Machine is a really good one. And I think it applies to all information on the net. I know I am overwhelmed and cant keep track of things and cant find things. Interfaces make that issue better. Wikis, like everything else on the net, cause information overload. Point and click access, better linking, better organization, better visualization, these are the things I care about. They may be beyond the scope of this groups efforts as it relates to a wiki. And to the extent that is true, I do agree that doing something in flash just the way it was done in html is not a useful exercise. But I just think we have **MUCH** farther to go in the areas of visualization, organization and access, and used properly, flash can be much better at that than html.
Regards,
HankOn 9/5/06, Martin Heidegger < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Well - we seem to work together : you point out the positive stuff and I point out the negative stuff.
In the end it might turn out that we are objective. I just don't see the point of trying to push flash into
the position for what html is made for. And I am furthermore saying that it should have a real effort
like: Beeing better than those already existed before. Flash is good - and I believe in that. Not just for
banners. But there are tools and ideas that fit and to me Wiki & HTML fit perfectly - thats all.
yours
Martin.2006/9/5, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:So in your estimation, flash is cool... but maybe just for banners and stuff. Leave the complex stuff to html and ajax.
Lets do a wiki for *flash* developers and be primarily concerned with the possibility that they dont have the plugin.
That will be quite an inspiration for new flash developers, dont you think?
By the way, I am not saying we *have to* use flash for anything. My view is that in the creative process, as people are bouncing ideas around, it makes a lot of sense to fully explore the role that flash can and should play in an osflash site.
Your desire seems to be to minimize that role because some developers may not have the plugin.
To me that seems odd.
RegardsHankOn 9/5/06, Martin Heidegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Well - i am sorry to say that but:
You want to create a product running on every device with the same ability accessable by every person whatsoever on
the net - because this is what a wiki offers. And furthermore I never said that it needs to be full qualified access - just
access. Its a difficulty but you should put your remarks high. So yes: I suggest a normal browser readable version and
yes maybe even a editor - but this one could be primitive and not fully featuring all layout elements.
yoursMartin.
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
--
ICQ: 117662935
Skype: mastakaneda
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
--
ICQ: 117662935
Skype: mastakaneda
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
