So in your estimation, flash is cool... but maybe just for banners and stuff. Leave the complex stuff to html and ajax.

Lets do a wiki for *flash* developers and be primarily concerned with the possibility that they dont have the plugin.

That will be quite an inspiration for new flash developers, dont you think?

By the way, I am not saying we *have to* use flash for anything. My view is that in the creative process, as people are bouncing ideas around, it makes a lot of sense to fully explore the role that flash can and should play in an osflash site.

Your desire seems to be to minimize that role because some developers may not have the plugin.

To me that seems odd.

Regards
Hank


On 9/5/06, Martin Heidegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well - i am sorry to say that but:

You want to create a product running on every device with the same ability accessable by every person whatsoever on
the net - because this is what a wiki offers. And furthermore I never said that it needs to be full qualified access - just
access. Its a difficulty but you should put your remarks high. So yes: I suggest a normal browser readable version and
yes maybe even a editor - but this one could be primitive and not fully featuring all layout elements.


yours
Martin.

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org



_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to