Paul Martz wrote: > I think noting it in the osgconv help text is the right thing to do. No > code change.
Ok. > The only other thing I would even remotely consider changing is the "-R > <suffix>" behavior. You can leave it as it is, it's up to you. But I > can't imagine why I'd ever want to leave off the optional suffix (which > would convert the top-level file to the specified format, but write the > subordinate files in their original format). What is your use case for > this? I guess if I were coding this, I'd remove the optional suffix > entirely, and just have "-R", and then all the exported files would get > the same extension, as taken from the top-level file specified on the > command line. I'd have to chew on that. It seems like there was a circumstance where I thought the optional extension was important and couldn't be automatically inferred. > Paul Martz > Skew Matrix Software LLC > _http://www.skew-matrix.com_ <http://www.skew-matrix.com/> > +1 303 859 9466 -- Chris 'Xenon' Hanson, omo sanza lettere Xenon AlphaPixel.com PixelSense Landsat processing now available! http://www.alphapixel.com/demos/ "There is no Truth. There is only Perception. To Perceive is to Exist." - Xen _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
