Hi Chris, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson <[email protected]> wrote: >> This change does raise the issue of how to implement the functionality >> that you are after. Could you explain at high level what you are >> after here. We can then start the process of working out how most >> efficiently to implement it. > > I am unclear which functionality you're asking about here -- the suffix, or > the overall > osgconv recursion capability?
Both, the two were intermixed in the case of the recursion code. Is this required? Can it be be totally independent? I'm happy to integrate one feature at a time, so perhaps tackling teh recursion first would be appropriate then add the suffix addition to this. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
