Hi Roman, On 9 October 2012 12:06, Roman Grigoriev <[email protected]> wrote: > I reviewed changes and vote for including in core OSG. > It's better than nothing. > Also I think that it will be better to connect transform feedback to objects > and not to camera,
When you say objects, what specifically do you mean. Subgraphs? Leaf nodes? > because we use shaders to transform geometries and TF used for transforming > geometries and not for rendering. My preconception is the transform feedback would be an order dependent pipeline of handling vertex transformation. Enforcing the strict order required will require use multiple RenderStage/RenderBin or RenderBin sort order, or possibly a fine grained ordering enforced by draw callbacks or extension to osg::Geometry. > Also I reviewed UBO changes and think that it's also very good extension to > OSG. It's also on my TODO list. Unfortunately I'm rather stretched this week and next with trips away so will only be able to get to tackling more big submissions in a couple of weeks. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
