Martin Spott wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> "Robert Osfield" wrote:
> 
>> Just been informed by Tim Moore that FlightGear-1.0 is not of OSG
>> blood, but the old PLib code base, the OSG based version still has
>> some missing features left is this branch to complete.  It would seem
>> that not only are they pushing ahead with the OSG version but mantaing
>> the old branch as well.
> 
> Indeed, unfortunately some people preferred to build (ugly) workarounds
> in the PLIB branch - for features that are available in the OSG-based
> tree right out of the box. This has been wasting quite some resources
> that likely would have been suitable to add the missing features to the
> OSG version.
> 
> So in the end some backwards-oriented people decided to build a PLIB-
> based release - coupled with the promise to stop development of the
> PLIB-branch right after the release and instead focusing on the
> OSG-basead HEAD now.
> 
> Actually the FlightGear/OSG runs extremely stable, it just misses a few
> features but (as you already knew  :-)  On the other hand Flightgear/OSG
> offers some nice effects that would never had been possible with PLIB
> and which brought us quite some recognition when being displayed on
> public shows.
> 
> Cheers,
>       Martin.

what "world" are you using in flightgear? i still think it would make sense if 
http://csp.sourceforge.net/ and fg share the same world. :)

cheers
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to