Well Robert,

 Why don't you make it straight - " This is My list and things should
go My way".

At least thats the feeling you seem to be having when you said this:
"....Otherwise I will just start ignoring posts. Then you don't get
the
support your want...."

Thats either a broad assumption or miscalculation or at least
disrespect for others who might be willing to help.

What ever it is, you are making this a very bad experience for users
by stipulating "if you want help, you have to do this".

It reminds me only one word, "Monopoly".

As for others like Andy and Gordon who are thinking "lets trade our
personality to Robert because he is helping us" - I have only this to
say - Save your self-respect guys. If he doesn't help - there would be
no one for him to help to. You need to understand this.

As for the cheques - let them ASK it, if they want. Robert, are you
doing all this for those big cheques that Gordon is talking about ? I
don't think so. Come on Gordon, Grow up.

Having said all of this, I meant no disrespect to anyone.

----------------------

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Robert Osfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Night Hawk
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  Thank you. I don't mean to be rude, but you have the option to
>  >  ignore/not reply the mails you don't feel like answering (or hard to
>  >  find addressing).
>
>  Well ignoring mails that I find rude is an option.  It's not one I
>  want to take, this is why I raise this topic, to fix it.
>
>  Otherwise I will just start ignoring posts. Then you don't get the
>  support your want.
>
>
>  >  So, I think we can take it easy. As I said, people have good reasons
>  >  for things they do.
>
>  People also often don't they are offending people unless its pointed out.
>
>
>
>  >  And also thanks for the others who has chimed-in some good fun in
>  >  previous replies. It was good time reading them, though I won't be
>  >  having much left to spare for any more replies on this topic. As I
>  >  said I don't like debates.
>  >
>  >  PS: By the way, who ever said "Rice" or "Bush" or "Bill" are more
>  >  human names than Night or Hawk :-)
>
>  The point I'm trying to make is that you need to sign your posts, it
>  doesn't matter what you decide, you can't just go adopt a silly name
>  and then think people will be happy to address you by it.
>
>  Now if you want to be addressed by Col, Night, Hawk, make your choice.
>
>  If you don't make a choice, then it'll be a that rude bloke who gets
>  ignored because he can't be bother engaging in basic way that most
>  humans find polite.
>
>
>
>  Robert.
>  _______________________________________________
>  osg-users mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to