Hi J-S, I haven't been following your CMake thread, there seems to be several CMake versions being mentioned.
Could you advise exactly which single CMake version I should use? Pls keep in mind I'm not a CMake expert, I'm looking for stability and results, not pushing the vanguard of CMake development. Thanks -- mew On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Jean-Sébastien Guay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > > > Issues outstanding that I'm aware of are: > > (...) > > > If you can think of anything else please speak up. > > No one replied to my message about using CMake 2.7.x on Windows/Visual > Studio with the current OSG CMake config files. I'm still having > problems because it seems that around CMake 2.6 the semantics of how > library directories are added changed. Please see my message from Friday > for details. > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.openscenegraph.user/26359/focus=26371 > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.openscenegraph.user/26359/focus=26372 > > I think this is a show stopper, we don't want people using CMake 2.6, > 2.7 or 2.8 (upcoming) on Windows to have trouble generating good Visual > Studio build files for OSG 2.4. > > So can the CMake experts please check my messages linked above and try > the latest versions of CMake on Windows? The changes needed are just a > bit more complex than my CMake expertise allows me to fix for the > moment. Luigi? Eric? > > Thanks, > > J-S > -- > ______________________________________________________ > Jean-Sebastien Guay [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.cm-labs.com/ > http://whitestar02.webhop.org/ > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > -- Mike Weiblen -- Austin Texas USA -- http://mew.cx/ _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
