cool, thanks. 2.4.7 is what I've been using. tho complete agree that we do need to keep moving fwd. -- mew
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Jean-Sébastien Guay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > > > I haven't been following your CMake thread, there seems to be several > > CMake versions being mentioned. > > > > Could you advise exactly which single CMake version I should use? Pls > > keep in mind I'm not a CMake expert, I'm looking for stability and > > results, not pushing the vanguard of CMake development. > > From what I can see, they changed some semantics around 2.6. > Personally, I just installed 2.7.x lately and OSG won't link properly > without some tweaks. So for now, I'd recommend you stick to the 2.4 > series. That was before they made the change in link directory > semantics, and OSG's CMake config is made to work with that. At work I > use 2.4.7 and it works properly with the current OSG config. > > But as ever, we need to be compatible with the new versions of CMake > that come out, so just telling everyone "keep away from any CMake >= > 2.6" is not the right solution IMHO. > > Anyways. There you have it. > > > > J-S > -- > ______________________________________________________ > Jean-Sebastien Guay [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.cm-labs.com/ > http://whitestar02.webhop.org/ > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > -- Mike Weiblen -- Austin Texas USA -- http://mew.cx/ _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
