If 2.6 can solve the need to having the config files in the source (for
out-of-source environment) then I'll be looking forward to the change. :)
Ideally cmake scripts should be able to work out good defaults given a
platform, and find a way to setup the environment. Now that I am thinking
about it they should have been able to add them into the preprocessor
definition list /D [macro], and then atomic (and others) could have some
ifdef check to bypass the need to include a config file.
James Killian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Osfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OpenSceneGraph Users" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [osg-users] Improvements for OSX application bundles
Hi James,
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 7:49 PM, James Killian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does your suggestion mean 2.6x for just OSX or for all platforms?
Just for OSX. Although for other later platforms combinations we
might need to require this as well.
I
initially tried 2.6 for VS 9, and it had some strange issues like
creating 2
folders for each project.
Both CMake 2.6 and VS 9 are pretty new so it make take a little time
for 2.6 to fully support VS 9. This is an issue that needs to be
brought up with the Cmake team, but first we need to characterise it a
bit more - i.e. see others reproduce it, work out what bits causes
things to go unstuck.
Robert.
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
