Hello Mathias,

Alternatively, cmake povides an 'install' target on unix builds. I do not know if this is also available in win32.

Yes, and I always use it, and it works (copies the Config header). So no problem there.

I see that problem.
Appologies for not testing that stuff on windows. I was just too naive to believe that this will just work. And given that I do cross platform development here at work I must have known that better. Sorry!

Hehe, classic mistake! :-)

I believe that I will provide something that will use inline versions of that atomic functions if possible but will make some cpp file implementation if this does not make sense like in the win32 case ...

I think if you declare both the declaration and implementation of a method inline, the compiler will take that as a hint that it should be inlined if possible... But yes, windows.h should only be included in a .cpp file in the case of a header like Atomic that is included everywhere...

Robert, ok?

Robert is not checking his mails until Thursday. Since this currently prevents building on Windows, I would say go ahead.

I guess that this will be ready about tomorrow. I hope that you can live with that until then ...

OK, I was having a go at doing it, but if you want to go ahead, you're more familiar with it than I am.

Thanks,

J-S
--
______________________________________________________
Jean-Sebastien Guay    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                               http://www.cm-labs.com/
                        http://whitestar02.webhop.org/
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to