Hi JS, On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Jean-Sébastien Guay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree, and I totally understand about getting a first iteration running > and then improving it. I just wanted to make sure you were aware that it's > not the best way and we'd probably need to work on it a bit before this > stuff is rolled into osgWidget.
Just for clarity, I don't plan on making any direct poppler/xul dependencies in osgWidget. My plan is to provide interfaces in osgWidget that plugins implement, similar in the way I've kept the vnc functionality entirely wrapped up in its own plugin. On the browser front I'm expecting multiple implementations to exist - a first cut that uses the current libxul/llmozlib functionality, and later there will be one or two webkit based ones. Eventually the backend implementations will settle down and we'll be able to cut the implementations down to one that is known to work well. Right now embedded browser functionality is very bleeding edge, lots of customized builds of webkit and libxul/xul-runner abound in embedded browser attempts. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
