Thanx Robert for your reply.
With single view I have 50 fps with stereo I have 25 fps. It is very
predictable result.
Event 0.05
Update 1.36 (two Intersense InertiaCube3 sensors)
Cull   5.2 (clouds)
Draw   2.16 (ephemeris,clouds)
GPU      27.2
I simply try to improve it.
I have single 8600GT. But for stereo config I will use double GTX280. Hopes
that It will change situation.
Bye


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Osfield
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 12:20 PM
To: OpenSceneGraph Users
Subject: Re: [osg-users] RTT and stereo (corrected)

Hi Roman,

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Roman Grigoriev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So for now I solve problem by doing all postprocess operations for left
and
> right eye and have huge frame drop to 25 fps L

Stereo rendering normally incurrs a performacne hit, as you are
doubling the amount of work done.  Is ther performance
disproportional?

> Could someone please give me recommendations what is better render to one
> big texture both left and right eye (1600*600) or render to two small
> textures (800*600)?

Design wise it would be much easier to have one texture pure eye.
Performance wise it probably won't make too much difference as the
bottlenecks aren't likely to be related to setup of FBO's/teuxtures.
You "might" see a performance improvement with using a single texture,
but I doubt it would be worthwhile.

I'd recommend looking at your wider performance bottlenecks.  What is
your cull/draw costs? Due you have two graphics cards and a multi-core
GPU available?

Robert.
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org


_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to