Greate news (or bad news) that means we have not a windows issue. what
happens when you switch to singelthreaded ?

/adrian

2009/2/1 Simon Loic <[email protected]>

> Hi,
> in my case when I am runing osgviewer on a ubuntu distribution with 4 cores
> I get 25% of cpu, which means that one of my cores is over used. One of my
> colleagues have exactly the same behavior. Thus I don't think this is
> windows related only.
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Glenn Waldron <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Adrian,
>>
>> I have observed an intermittent problem on Windows in which osgviewer
>> starts up using a high CPU %, but then cycling through the threading
>> modes with 'm' makes the problem go away - even when you return to the
>> mode in which you started. I never did figure out why.
>>
>> Just a data point...
>>
>>
>> Glenn Waldron : Pelican Mapping : http://pelicanmapping.com :
>> +1.703.652.4791
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Adrian Egli OpenSceneGraph (3D)
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi Cory,
>> >
>> > I am working with Windows Vista dual core system. I get 50% CPU usage
>> when i
>> > am running osgviewer cow.osg if i start
>> > osgviewer cow.osg --SingleThreaded i have no longer 50% CPU usage , now
>> i
>> > have about 0.5-3% CPU usage !!!!!
>> >
>> > i am very busy at the moment, but may tomorrow i will debug the OSG
>> core,
>> > may there is a bug inside or a thread running at max.
>> > or robert has some idea,where i can start with debugging. may it's a
>> windows
>> > vista bug
>> >
>> > adrian
>> >
>> >
>> > 2009/2/1 Robert Osfield <[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >> Hi Cory,
>> >>
>> >> I'll have to defer to others on the situation under Windows when doing
>> >> remote desktop.  My guess is that it's likely to be a driver issue.
>> >>
>> >> Robert.
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Cory Riddell <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> > I'm not sure about vysync. I'll look that up and check it.
>> >> >
>> >> > I thought about the possibility of it being a debug build and I don't
>> >> > think
>> >> > that's it. In my bin directory I have osgviewer.exe at 25,600 bytes
>> and
>> >> > osgviewerd.exe at 81,920 bytes. Both executables give me the same CPU
>> >> > pegging behavior (as observed by SysInternals Process Explorer).
>> >> >
>> >> > My command line is "osgviewer.exe --window 100 100 200 200
>> cessna.osg".
>> >> > My
>> >> > video card is an ATI FireGL V7700 and the drivers are up to date.
>> >> >
>> >> > Ah- I just noticed something-- an error message:
>> >> > Windows Error #127: [Screen #0] ChooseMatchingPixelFormat() -
>> >> > wglChoosePixelFormatARB extension not found, trying GDI. Reason: The
>> >> > specified procedure could not be found.
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm running over remote desktop right now, so perhaps that's related.
>> I
>> >> > don't recall seeing this error message before.
>> >> >
>> >> > Cory
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Robert Osfield
>> >> > <[email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Cory,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It's not normal to have this high level of CPU usage for this model,
>> >> >> the expceptions to this would be:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>    You have vysync switched off, so the app is racing as fast it can
>> >> >> to dispatch frames
>> >> >>    You've compiled the OSG with debug build.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Robert.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Cory Riddell <[email protected]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > When I run the osg viewer app and load just about any osg file
>> (like
>> >> >> > cesna.osg), my CPU usage is a constant 23% - 30%. This is with no
>> >> >> > interaction, it is basically using an entire CPU core.
>> Fortunatelly I
>> >> >> > have a
>> >> >> > 4 core machine, so it hasn't been a problem so far, but I'm
>> wondering
>> >> >> > what
>> >> >> > this means for single core machines (which most of our customers
>> >> >> > have).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Is this typical?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Cory
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > osg-users mailing list
>> >> >> > [email protected]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> osg-users mailing list
>> >> >> [email protected]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > osg-users mailing list
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> osg-users mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >>
>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ********************************************
>> > Adrian Egli
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > osg-users mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> >
>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> osg-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Loïc Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>
>


-- 
********************************************
Adrian Egli
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to