Robert Osfield wrote:
Hi Sukender,
I apply a pain vs gain to this type of decision. How much pain is it
to maintain 2.4.x support vs how much pain it would be to those who'd
have to upgrade, and also against how much we have to gain in
streamlining our own maintenance work. Right now for Cmake 2.4.x it
doesn't seem too difficult to retain support.
One reason I like CMake 2.6 more than 2.4 is that it seems to have
worked around the stupid and time-consuming "relink" step that it did
when doing "make install". When I call "make" and it finishes I expect
to have a fully built set of libraries and executables, not something
that isn't directly installable by simply copying files to a destination
directory.
I'm on a system where only CMake 2.4 is available, btw, but it's hardly
any pain to compile and install 2.6 by hand.
Paul
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
