Hi folks,
> > I've offered my (part-time) help in maintaining the OSG site to Jose > Luis in the past, but he said since the server belonged to his school > they would be reluctant to let an "outsider" get access to one of their > servers. Perhaps when the server is moved to a virtual server, this > issue would be less important since the server would be isolated from > their own network, and I could lend a hand. > Guys, if there is a problem with a server, I could also offer one for particular projects, maybe also for main osg. The same one on which osgForum is currently running. It is true, that the main osg server has very bad connection times, at least here at my ISPs ;) > > I think getting a distributed infrastructure and letting users register > (both for accounts to edit the wiki and for OSGForge projects) is of > vital importance for OSG's surrounding ecosystem, especially since we > are talking more and more about nodekits being important for OSG 2.x and new > API support/tests being important for OSG 3.x. > This was also my main point, which I tried to point out in another thread. The problem is, that there exists now a lot of nice nodekits, but nodekits, which are not happy to be included into main core, could not survive in the future, becasue they just don't get notified by users (yes, I am afraid of osgPPU too ;) ) Hence some kind of other nodekit system is required, so that the users still get enough information, what happens outside of the main core. Best regards, art ------------------ Read this topic online here: http://osgforum.tevs.eu/viewtopic.php?p=5962#5962 _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
