Thank you!! -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Osfield Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:46 PM To: OpenSceneGraph Users Subject: Re: [osg-users] Composite viewer vs. Viewer
Hi Shayne, osgViewer::Viewer and osgViewer::CompositeViewer both use the same threading and rendering code, found in the common base class osgViewer::ViewerBase's renderingTraversals() method. This means that is pretty well no difference in threading models supported, nor performance, nor how they handle multiple cameras. The difference is all in the high level interfaces to the viewers, each targets a different class of viewer usage. Robert. On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Tueller, Shayne R Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEC <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > > > Can anyone tell me if the composite viewer uses the same threading > models/schemes as the regular viewer? Also does the regular viewer have any > advantages over the composite viewer in terms of rendering performance when > using multiple cameras? > > > > The latter question may be a bit too vague so please accept my apologies if > it is. > > > > Thanks, > > -Shayne > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > > _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
