Hi Robert.
Robert Osfield wrote: > ...I'm curious about the name, osgPipe, why Pipe? SGI used to use the > name Pipe in the context of graphics hardware/graphics contexts... Oh, we did not know... We chose the name "pipe" because the part which runs on the GPU based on CUDA, for example, is organized more in a pipeline structure than in a graph-structure. Right now seems to be a good time to change the name to something else since we didn't release it to the public so far. What would you prefer? We suggest: osgGPP (general purpose processing) It could also be the base for OpenCL. What do you think? > If you have happy with what you've got already could you post the > changed file to osg-submissions Done - I already posted it to the osg-submissions list. > Documentation vs coding... the later always wins in time to market :-) :-) Best regards, Mick -- SVT Group ------------------ Read this topic online here: http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=8365#8365 _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
