Hi Cristian,

For best performance clumping geometry together into a smaller set of large
tree clusters would be best.  As Roland says the osgforest example does
flesh out all the different approach that one can use, and misses some that
provided the best performance such as clustering lots of trees together into
the same osg::Geometry object.

Robert.

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Christian Sam <osgfo...@tevs.eu> wrote:

> hi,
>
> refering to osgforest as example, is a method like createTransformGraph,
> where the different looking trees are based on the same (scaled) tree model
> better from a performance point of view? i mean better than the two other
> fixed pipeline methods in this example
>
> thanks in advance,
> christian
>
> ------------------
> Read this topic online here:
> http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=9760#9760
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to