Hi, I don't think it would make sense anyway to review a code where very few people find interest. So I totally understand your position. Anyway, from what I've seen on this ML, users are quite active and I think they just didn't paid attention. So let's wait for feedback. Cheers. Loïc
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Robert Osfield <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Simon Loic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > I'm not sure if the code is clean enough to fulfill OSG standards. Yet I > was > > expecting some feedbacks about the manipulator (stability on different > > machines, missing features, weird behaviours, ...) before to release a > > submission. > > > > If you feel it's clean enough I guess you can check it in. Yet, as we > don't > > get any feedback, maybe it's not worth it. > > I was hoping to have feedback from others before diving in with a > review myself. I have plenty on my plate so having to do all the > review work myself is something I'd rather not do. > > Robert. > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > -- Loïc Simon
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
