Hi Paul,
I know I risk making the thread diverge into unrelated concerns, but I
wanted to ask:
If you ever submit
your node for inclusion in OSG, you can migrate the cull handling code
into osgUtil::CullVisitor at the time you make the submission. This is
what I did when I developed OcclusionQueryNode.
Are there advantages to modifying CullVisitor rather than overriding
traverse(), other than one dynamic_cast per frame per node? I think if
that's the only advantage, I'd personally prefer keeping all the code
related to the node type local to the type itself, even if that node
type were to be included into OSG.
But that's a coding style concern, I just want to know what you think
about this and if there's something I have missed.
Thanks,
J-S
--
______________________________________________________
Jean-Sebastien Guay [email protected]
http://www.cm-labs.com/
http://whitestar02.webhop.org/
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
