one question. I am not familiar with this piece of code at all, but , does the osgdotnet wrapper depends on it? If so, I am very interested in keeping it alive
-Nick On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Jean-Sébastien Guay < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > > Given the repeated problems I face, and the lack of active usage of >> osgIntrospection out in the community I am ready to move >> osgIntrospection out of the core. It has long been a real maintenance >> problem for me and I really know my own productivity will improve with >> moving osgIntrospection out of the core. >> > > I totally agree with this. If the wrappers were moved out of the core, it > would bring two benefits: > > 1) changes to OSG will not cause a part of OSG that is not maintained and > complicated to stop building. > 2) it will be easier to give over the reins of maintaining the wrappers to > someone else. Potentially they could say "svn rev X of the wrappers build > against svn rev Y of OSG", and then update them at their leisure as they > need the wrappers to support more recent revisions of OSG. > > So I think it would be a good idea, and would also go toward the goal of > lightening the load on your shoulders. Go for it :-) > > J-S > -- > ______________________________________________________ > Jean-Sebastien Guay [email protected] > http://www.cm-labs.com/ > http://whitestar02.webhop.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org >
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
