Hi Robert, Err... Too late! I've made the single/double precision Tessellator... I'll send it in a minute on osg-submissions. Well of course it should be replaced with non-GLU calls, but until then the double precision works... and you know how "temporary" can become "very long term temporary", hey?
BTW, what about getting some GLU code and include it directly in OSG? Is this legally possible? Is it optimized enough? Is this portable enough? Just my two cents... Sukender PVLE - Lightweight cross-platform game engine - http://pvle.sourceforge.net/ ----- "Robert Osfield" <robert.osfi...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi Sukender, > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Sukender <suky0...@free.fr> wrote: > > Maybe a good idea, but DelaunayTriangulator is single precision > only, and there is a lot of code. I must admit I don't have enough > time for "porting" DelaunayTriangulator yet. > > I think porting Tessellator to doubles when we have to replace it > soon > is a wasted effort. We do at least know that DelaunayTriangulator > while it has flaws is deprecated by lack of GLU. > > Robert. > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
