Hi Luca, On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Luca Vezzadini <[email protected]>wrote: > > I gave it a try, the description lines are there. I just see a minor issue: > you did not add the MaterialData.{h,cpp} to Cmake. > About the results, looks like what is there is fine! I'll do more testing > in the next days, trying to use the definitions in my shaders as well, and > let you know. >
Laurens just submitted a patch that fixes the Cmake issue. > The testMat2 is using the tx directly as a bitmap, while TestMap first has > a NormalMap texture, then the bitmap. In the output they look totally > equivalent though. Looking at the code, it seems that you treat them as > separate cases: so, what about adding an extra field at the end of TestMap > to indicate it's a normal map? The field could actually be even smarter and > indicate the active texture space (tangent, screen, ...). > My intention was to add more keywords that would describe each map in more detail, depending on the texture type. In your example, I could add the following line to provide more information regarding the bump map on unit 2: Normal <unit> <amount> <method> Normal 2 1.0 Tangent This let's you know that the bitmap type on unit 2 is a normal map with the specified settings. I could eventually add keywords to provide additional info for Mix maps and Reflection maps. Does this sound reasonable to you? Cheers, Farshid
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
