Hi Glenn, On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Glenn Waldron <[email protected]> wrote: > Here are some pros: > Github's pull-request system is nice (as a replacement for the > osg-submissions process). You can do your diff analysis right in the > browser. Here's an example: http://goo.gl/KacWp
Thanks for the link. I find patch syntax good for a quick look, but not sufficient for full code review. Is there any system for doing a graphical diff between the submission and the original? It could be that the later I just do manually on my local system like I do right now when I formally accept a patch. > The integrated wiki is supposedly git-backed, i.e. all your wiki pages are > stored in a repository alongside the source repo. So in theory migrating the > existing wiki over should be a matter of pushing the files up there. > (Haven't tried it though.) Pulling in a wiki would be easy if it used exactly the same wiki syntax but I very much down Tracs wiki and Gollum wiki are compatible. At best there would be a converter. > Github also has an integrated issue-tracker if you decide to use it someday. Tracs has one that I never got into ;-) Never say never, but for now my priority is migrating the website, subversion -> git and cdash across. Having the possibility of issue tracking is no bad thing, let sort out everything else first. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
