Hi,

After some struggle I have managed to make a cookbook for building OSG with 
Visual C++ 2015. This is very exciting because I should finally be able to 
build our structural impact modeling application on Windows. There are a few 
items that would be great to get some feedback on:

For best (release build) performance would it make sense to use /fp:fast (along 
with /O2 /GS-) or could this create problems with propagation of the NaNs that 
can arise in OSG?

Would trying to build with Intel C++ likely to give significantly better 
performance? This is probably a question of whether OSG would benefit from its 
better auto-vectorization.

If I stick with the VC++ 2015 OSG build I should be OK linking my application 
built with Intel C++ 2016 to it since they seem to be binary compatible, right?


Since I'll need to build future OSG releases I am willing to host the Windows 
OSG (starting with 3.4.0) binary packages on our company website if someone on 
the OSG team wants to add a link to it on the Stable Releases page. Just let me 
know who best to contact.

Thank you!

Cheers,
Stuart[/list]

------------------
Read this topic online here:
http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=66848#66848





_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to