If OpenGL commands were limited to StateSets and Drawables, then it would be possible to derive your own "OpenGL ES" versions of these classes. As a result, the RenderGraph would be composed solely of classes that limit themselves to OpenGL ES commands and features. It might be nice, down the road, to implement a selectable rendering backend (a la a factory pattern).
With current OSG, I imagine memory footprint is a significant issue. A smaller, cleaner, core OSG with limited functionality would be required. Robert has mentioned doing this in the past. -Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of c sklu > Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 3:20 AM > To: osg users > Subject: Re: [osg-users] OS Poll > > Any chance of things getting ported to OpenGL ES? I've been > experimenting with developing for Windows Mobile (shudder...) > and am trying to avoid having to write raw OpenGL code, or I > don't even want to think about Direct3D. There is one toolkit > I've found, Ogre3D which allows to switch rendering backends > which is nice because OpenGL performance on my PDA is pretty > poor compared to Direct3D. > > Chris > > On 11/1/06, Don Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, and I would like to see OSG running on a Palm :) > > > > > > I think either the respondents didn't read the "you use with OSG" > > part of the question, or they are just showing off. :) > > > > -don > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osg-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users > > http://www.openscenegraph.org/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users > http://www.openscenegraph.org/ _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
