W.r.t binaries I am thinking that we needn't supply the example
programs with the binaries, as the examples are their many as source
code examples, something that end users will compile if they want
them. With the range of dependencies that the new viewer examples
introduce would also complicate the inclusion of examples too.
Thoughts?
Robert.
____
Hi,
I differ on this one. I think that binaries are mostly used by people
new to osg who want to see what it does. When I started to investigate
which graphics library to use for my application, it was really very
good to have the examples together with the library in a nice installer.
When I started to do real work with the osg I compiled it myself anyway
(as I used to use mingw, and there are no binaries), and when you get
used to it, it´s no big deal to build it. But for people who use the
binaries the examples are important.
Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/
