Is the 2.0 release still on for sometime in the next couple weeks? I'm wrapping up the Quick Start Guide revision and would prefer to say that it documents v2.0 rather than v1.9.x, so let me know what the release schedule looks like. -Paul
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Robert Osfield > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 10:33 AM > To: osg users > Subject: [osg-users] Release schedule for 2.0, end of of May, > early June! > > Hi All, > > I have exchanged emails with Paul Martz about getting 2.0 out > in time for his publishing on the Quick Start Guide, should > be out in the first week of June with a final draft before this. > > So this gives 2-3 weeks to get 2.0 out the door. Yikes you > might think, and rightly so ;-) > > First up I have to say that I'd like now we have weekly dev > releases going out, without too much overhead at my end > (takes about a hour of my time), doing minor point releases > for stable versions should not be so daunting as it was. I > we can make minor point releases more often, then having one > that is not quite perfect is much less of a worry - since > another one will come out shortly after to fix any problems > that arise. > > The real difference between a dev release and stable release > is a bit more testing in the run up, the production of > binaries, and the > updating of docs on the website. I can't do most of this myself, > I'll need members of the community to pitch in with testing, > producing the binaries and help get the web pages updated. > Also the more streamlined we can make all of this, the > quicker and more often we can get releases out. At least > that the theory.. > > Due to this quick time frame I simply won't be able to > complete all of functionality that I wanted for 2.0, such as > osgViewer, osgShadow and osgTerrain work, this is shame, but > I'd now rather have a 2.0 out in time for the book to go, and > to keep the book straight forward in terms of referencing 2.0 > binaries and source cde - otherwise you'll end up with a book > talking about something that hasn't come out yet, and > binaries that don't exist, or it ends up bogged down talking > about dev releases. > > Overall my impression is that the 1.9.x dev series have been > pretty stable, a few hiccups here and there on build and > execution, but my guess we are well in the same ballpark as > the quality of 1.2, and in many areas I know it far exceeds > that of 1.2 since we've made so many bugs fixes over the past > 8 months. > > For the loose ends we currently have, I'd say lets log them, > try and fix them for 2.0, but if we can't just push ahead get > 2.0 - just make sure there is no show stoppers on the main > platforms. Any remaining loose end we can scoop up after 2.0 > with 2.0.1, 2.0.2 etc releases. > > I look forward to feedback and your assistance. In > particular we need volunteers to build binaries on the 3 main > platforms - Windows, Linux and OSX. > > Thanks in advance, > Robert. > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users > http://www.openscenegraph.org/ _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
