Thanks. SimpleViewer will not be mentioned in the upcoming QSG revision. 
   -Paul


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Robert Osfield
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 2:22 AM
> To: osg users
> Subject: Re: [osg-users] Release schedule for 2.0, end of of 
> May, early June!
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On 5/29/07, Paul Martz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If I can I would like to replace SimpleViewer by Viewer 
> this week, 
> > > since I think that will just simplify life all round, the 
> QSG will 
> > > need to reflect this by just removing the paragraphs that mention 
> > > it.
> >
> > I want to make sure I understand you correctly: Are you saying that 
> > you're removing the SimpleViewer class entirely? Or are you just 
> > making it a wrapper around Viewer?
> 
> My current thought is that is should be possible to use 
> Viewer as a drop in replacement for SimpleViewer, they 
> already share many of the
> same functions so porting across should be pretty painless.   Given
> this there shouldn't be any need for SimpleViewer or any 
> wrapper around Viewer so SimpleViewer will be removed completely.
> 
> The tricky bit is the management of events and the new
> renderingTraversals() implementation and perhaps a proxy 
> GraphicsWindow implementation to help glue multi-window 
> embedded usage together.  This is mainly internal 
> implementation details though, its the hard part, but I 
> believe perfectly doable.
> 
> Robert.
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
> http://www.openscenegraph.org/

_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/

Reply via email to