Well said Robert

Many folks fail to realize, ignore or forget that's there's no magic wand
and think SceneGraphs
will make up for bad modeling or just do every thing for you.......... its
some thing I cannot
stress enough especially when I'm teaching, is that you need a good
Scenegraph such as OSG and a
good application built around the scenegraph you also have to design your
app and models to be
effective... for the scenario and requirements of each simulation

OSG provides a one heck of a set of good tools and possibilities but as of
yet its not omnipotent ;)
more complete for every conceivable use, but a long way down the road, but
not yet omnipotent

If OSG does not fill in all your needs show me the scenegraph that offers
more for the cost...

You can easily extend OSG if it not got what you need
You can wait until someone maybe contributes what you looking for
You can contract some one to extend is such a Robert, Paul Martz and many
others on this list


Best Regards

Gordon

__________________________________________________________
Gordon Tomlinson
YIM/AIM: Gordon3dBrit
MSN IM : Gordon3dBrit @ 3dSceneGraph.com
__________________________________________________________
"Self defence is not a function of learning tricks
but is a function of how quickly and intensely one
can arouse one's instinct for survival"
- Master Tambo Tetsura



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Osfield
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:25 AM
To: osg users
Subject: Re: [osg-users] Culling and performance scaling


Hi Paul,

I really strikes me that your response to scene graphs needs to be
informed by real experience.

The OSG does allow applications to scale well.  There is no magic wand
though.  Its not about digging into OpenGL - the OSG wraps this up for
you - but you have to construct a decent scene graph to get best
performance.  The OSG support a wide range of culling techniques, it
support FBO's, VBO's, PBO's, OpenGL fast paths, database paging,
multi-threading, LOD's, geees is a chocka full of features to help you
scale you data.  This is why people use the scene graphs and OSG in
particular.

Spend so time learning about it.  Performance optimization is a huge
topic, there are just dozens and dozens of different techniques and
database issues that you need to understand to make the best of your
simulation.  The OSG will help you make your life easier in many
respects but in the end its not magical, you still need to invest the
time in making a good database, this involves not just programming but
also great modelers who understand the needs of real-time graphics.

Robert.

On 6/29/07, Paul Kahler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 20:02 -0600, Paul Martz wrote:
> >
> > What other kinds of culling are you looking for?
>
> I was hoping for something better. Even just a BSP tree or something.
> The reply about OpenGL occlusion query was hopeful, but that's on
> someone's todo list apparently. That approach doesn't impress me a whole
> lot either unless you're going to implement HZB or something really
> worthwhile - I'm not sure if anyone has ever really made progress with
> that either.
>
> To be honest, someone asked me to take a look at OSG and give my
> thoughts about it. Performance scaling is important to me and probably
> the person who asked. In this area OSG falls short. Realism is also
> important (to me) and from the images on the site OSG can be good in
> that area - though it's not clear to me how much of that is OSG and how
> much is up to the programmer. The fact that it seems to require one to
> use OpenGL directly makes me think a lot is left to the application
> programmer. The new osgviewer library probably hides that complexity
> though.
>
> IMHO a scene graph is not a terribly useful structure except for
> localized cases. They work well for articulated objects that are man
> made. Putting those objects as nodes in a world size graph is not
> terribly useful. They also don't do much for organic forms. Large data
> structures like that are great if they are used to accelerate rendering,
> but when used for this it should be automatic and not up to the
> programmer to optimize a database or insert special occluder nodes and
> so on.
>
> That said, anyone doing a 3d app will probably have to write a bunch of
> code that overlaps what's in OSG already. Not mention they'd have to
> debug it all. The there's the price ;-) And it turns out they have a
> very active mailing list with helpful people. Another plus.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Kahler
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 7:29 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [osg-users] Culling and performance scaling
> > >
> > > I've been poking around on the OSG site and the mailing list
> > > and it's not clear to me how well OSG scales with geometric
> > > complexity (polygon count). I understand view frustum culling
> > > and back-face culling, but it's not clear to me if OSG can do
> > > more than that. For example, if I have an entire town modeled
> > > with terrain, buildings, furniture, under what conditions
> > > will OSG skip drawing a chair inside a room?
> > >
> > > Or more simply, what does OSG do to skip rendering objects
> > > obstructed by other objects?
> > >
> > > Speaking theoretically: back-face culling eliminates about
> > > 1/2 of all polygons. View frustum culling eliminates perhaps
> > > all but 1/4 of polygons in a large city viewed from the
> > > middle of town. From a time complexity standpoint this turns
> > > a O(n) problem where n is the number of polygons, into O(n/8)
> > > which is really just k*O(n) = O(n). A constant improvement
> > > but still linear. Does OSG do better? How?
> > >
> > > I understand that creating impostors and using LOD techniques
> > > can also improve performance, but my question is strictly in
> > > regard to methods that don't simplify geometry (i.e. culling).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
> http://www.openscenegraph.org/
>
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/


_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/

Reply via email to