ugh, please excuse my poor spelling and grammar!
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Raymond Auge <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Ferry Huberts <[email protected]> wrote: > >> For (semantic) versioning in OSGi the bundle version actually is >> meaningless. It's a marketing number, so 6.2.0 in your case. >> >> Only package versions have meaning. >> >> Of course you can always version everything the same, but a single major >> change will bump _everything_ to 7.0.0. I hope you're aware of that... >> > > Yeah, I surely understand that... but I want to start from something that > makes sense! Starting at 1.0 will confuse everyone who has been consuming > our produce for years. > > I'm also not suggesting that we would just update all the package versions > to the same value... that would be pointless. > > I'm certainly taking about "baselining" the initial versions, just not > with 1.0. > > > -- > *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> > (@rotty3000) > Senior Software Architect > *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay) > > -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay)
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
