On 31/07/13 19:23, Raymond Auge wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Ferry Huberts <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > For (semantic) versioning in OSGi the bundle version actually is > meaningless. It's a marketing number, so 6.2.0 in your case. > > Only package versions have meaning. > > Of course you can always version everything the same, but a single major > change will bump _everything_ to 7.0.0. I hope you're aware of that... > > > Yeah, I surely understand that... but I want to start from something > that makes sense! Starting at 1.0 will confuse everyone who has been > consuming our produce for years. > > I'm also not suggesting that we would just update all the package > versions to the same value... that would be pointless. > > I'm certainly taking about "baselining" the initial versions, just not > with 1.0.
Then just start with the versions from where you are now ;-) No problem for the (our) tooling PS. it's a work in progress, if you find issues, please report them (although it should work quite well already) > > -- > *Raymond Augé* > <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) > Senior Software Architect > *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay) > -- Ferry Huberts _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
