If my example is just about exposing a service using REST or TCP then
the generic part will be:
Add the property service.exported.interfaces=* and some provider
specific properties to your OSGi service.
The TopologyManager will pick up your service and export it using the
RemoteServiceAdmin service of your implementation.
This will not really help a user to get it up and running.
On the other hand it is not necessary to explain the architecture to get
someone up and running. So while I think the architecture of RSA is
really great it is not what people need to get started.
Christian
On 10.11.2016 12:00, Timothy Ward wrote:
Hi Christian,
Unfortunately it is not really possible to describe a practical
example for RSA without implementation specific details.
I disagree with this statement. It’s perfectly possible to discuss the
RSA architecture, and then to provide an example which uses one of the
implementations without listing any implementation details. The
implementation details should not matter at all for a practical
example! The thing that will matter is the set of bundles that you
need to deploy for the RSA implementation, but beyond that it’s just a
case of starting up some frameworks and following the specification
properties.
If it weren’t possible to do this then it would not have been possible
to create a Compliance Test Suite for RSA!
Tim
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
http://www.talend.com
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
