Me four.
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 4, 2008, at 9:23 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
I agree with BJ and Richard about having one public osgi list (i.e.
osgi-dev). Describing what is appropriate for advanced vs. newbie
lists will be hard to explain. Also, I think many of the same
responders will have to subscribe to both lists anyway. Maybe I'm
selfish, but I do not look forward to joining yet another mailing
list :)
Tom
<graycol.gif>"Richard S. Hall" ---02/04/2008 10:36:21 AM---I sort of
agree with BJ on this. We are better off having one list that
<ecblank.gif>
From: <ecblank.gif>
"Richard S. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<ecblank.gif>
To: <ecblank.gif>
OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>
<ecblank.gif>
Date: <ecblank.gif>
02/04/2008 10:36 AM
<ecblank.gif>
Subject: <ecblank.gif>
Re: [osgi-dev] Need for "osgi-users" list
I sort of agree with BJ on this. We are better off having one list
that
welcomes newbie questions and/or advanced questions about OSGi
technology (i.e., osgi-dev)...if the question needs to be directed
to a
specific OSGi implementations, then we have sufficient knowledge
here to
direct the poster to that community.
-> richard
BJ Hargrave wrote:
> I am not sure what the distinction would be between the current
osgi-dev
> list and the proposed osgi-users list.
>
> The current osgi-dev list is described as: "This is a technical
mail list
> for OSGi Developers. Any OSGi technical discussion or questions are
> acceptable here."
>
> Since OSGi is a specification (and the implementations all have
their own
> -users lists), the "users" of the specification *are* developers.
Yes, the
> type of questions may vary from detailed discussion of some areas
of the
> spec to "how do I install a bundle?" But these are all developer
> questions.
>
> The type of questions like "how do I start the framework?" are more
> implementation specific questions that are outside the scope of
the OSGi
> specifications. These sorts of questions are best handled in the
> implementation specific forums.
>
> But perhaps I am missing something here. Do you see the 2 lists
catering
> to developers of differing OSGi experience levels? How do we
describe the
> 2 lists to make sure that people use the appropriate list?
>
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
