I agree with BJ and Richard about having one public osgi list (i.e.
osgi-dev).  Describing what is appropriate for advanced vs. newbie lists
will be hard to explain.  Also, I think many of the same responders will
have to subscribe to both lists anyway.  Maybe I'm selfish, but I do not
look forward to joining yet another mailing list :)

Tom




                                                                       
  From:       "Richard S. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                 
                                                                       
  To:         OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>        
                                                                       
  Date:       02/04/2008 10:36 AM                                      
                                                                       
  Subject:    Re: [osgi-dev] Need for "osgi-users" list                
                                                                       





I sort of agree with BJ on this. We are better off having one list that
welcomes newbie questions and/or advanced questions about OSGi
technology (i.e., osgi-dev)...if the question needs to be directed to a
specific OSGi implementations, then we have sufficient knowledge here to
direct the poster to that community.

-> richard

BJ Hargrave wrote:
> I am not sure what the distinction would be between the current osgi-dev
> list and the proposed osgi-users list.
>
> The current osgi-dev list is described as: "This is a technical mail list

> for OSGi Developers. Any OSGi technical discussion or questions are
> acceptable here."
>
> Since OSGi is a specification (and the implementations all have their own

> -users lists), the "users" of the specification *are* developers. Yes,
the
> type of questions may vary from detailed discussion of some areas of the
> spec to "how do I install a bundle?" But these are all developer
> questions.
>
> The type of questions like "how do I start the framework?" are more
> implementation specific questions that are outside the scope of the OSGi
> specifications. These sorts of questions are best handled in the
> implementation specific forums.
>
> But perhaps I am missing something here. Do you see the 2 lists catering
> to developers of differing OSGi experience levels? How do we describe the

> 2 lists to make sure that people use the appropriate list?
>
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

<<inline: graycol.gif>>

<<inline: ecblank.gif>>

_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to