Please find below an example of UPI's continuing coverage of
intelligence reform and related matters. I hope you find it interesting.
You may link to it on the web here:

http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20050406-110928-3005r

If you have any comments or questions about this piece, need any more
information about UPI products and services, or want to stop receiving
these alerts, please get in touch.

Thank you,

Shaun Waterman
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Tel: 202 898 8081


Wanted - A new school for spies
By Shaun Waterman
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor

WASHINGTON, April 7 (UPI) -- Among the less-noticed recommendations from
the president's commission on intelligence failure last week was the
establishment of a national intelligence university -- an administrative
umbrella over the training and education institutions run by the 15 U.S.
spy agencies.

Intelligence reformers say such an institution is essential to help
build a culture of cooperation among the oft-sparring agencies and
foster higher standards among their staffs. But they also acknowledge
that there is a delicate balance to be struck between shared standards
on the one hand and centralized training that risks encouraging
"groupthink" on the other.

Currently, "there is no initial training" for new intelligence personnel
"that instills a sense of community and shared mission," finds the final
report of the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United
States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction. 

Instead each agency trains its own personnel in the skills it thinks
they need, to its own standards and in its own institutions.

To fill this gap, the commission proposes that the national intelligence
university -- which it said "could be built easily and at modest expense
on top of existing ... infrastructure" -- should run common training and
education programs for employees of all the agencies, and facilitate
"the sharing of the community's training resources."

"There are schools all over the intelligence community, but -- like the
agencies themselves -- they tend to do their own thing, train their own
people and not worry enough about what everyone else (in the other
agencies) is doing," senior intelligence management official William
Nolte told United Press International.

"At the moment, if someone says 'I am a mid-level analyst at the
(National Security Agency),' that means nothing to anyone who isn't from
(that agency) or familiar with its personnel structure," said Nolte, who
previously ran education and training for the NSA.

One national security official, who was not authorized to speak to the
media and so did not want to be named, put it more pungently.

"Imagine if you were a pilot in the Air Force, and you're flying a
mission and your co-pilot is from the Army and you happen to ask him,
'Where did you get your wings?' And he says 'Wings? What are wings?'
Obviously, you wouldn't take off. But when you're working alongside
(people from other intelligence agencies), that's exactly what it's
like. You have no idea what training they've had."

Nolte also draw a contrast with the military, where he says there are
much clearer common standards. 

"A lieutenant in the Navy and a captain in the Army have basically
comparable seniority. You know basically what qualifications and skills
they have," he said.

The nation's intelligence agencies should be moving toward "something
closer to that," concluded Nolte.

The commission proposed that the university set curriculum standards
across the various institutions for all their facilities, and reformers
like Nolte say that eventually there should be common qualifications for
intelligence analysts. 

Last year's intelligence reform act established a new director of
national intelligence, to run the sprawling collection of agencies
called the intelligence community. 

Although the commission expressed the widespread fear that the
responsibilities of the new post outrun its authorities, the report also
points out that some of the strongest powers the director has are in
personnel.

These include the power to set professional standards across the
intelligence community, which reformers say could be leveraged into a
common initial training program and a shared core curriculum.

But there is also concern that such centralization might risk
encouraging the very "groupthink" among intelligence analysts that both
the commission and previous studies of intelligence failure have
identified as such a problem.

"The tension between getting better control and retaining or enhancing
analytic diversity is ... real," said one senior intelligence official
who was not authorized to speak to the media and did not want to be
named. The official added it was important to avoid simply replacing
"inadequate coordination (with) excessive centralization as our
fundamental condition."

Nor does the commission provide much assistance in striking this
delicate balance, beyond suggesting that "some" training should be
undertaken centrally.

"We hesitate to prescribe any specific level of centralization for
analytic and managerial training," the report reads.

The senior intelligence official said that the university should be run
more along the British model, where the individual colleges have
autonomy.

The commission proposes the creation of an assistant director of
national intelligence for human resources, to lead the exercise of the
new director's personnel authorities, and suggests that this official
would also oversee the national intelligence university.

The senior intelligence official said that although planning for the
university had begun, no real decisions could be made until John
Negroponte, tapped by the president for the new intelligence director's
post, had been confirmed.

In the plan currently being developed, the official said, there would be
a head of education and training for the director, who would also head
the university.

"We won't know for sure where this goes until Negroponte is confirmed
and gives his view on how he wants his office structured," the official
said.

One particular problem the commission identified was the lack of "an
adequate management training program" and the report suggests this might
be one of the reasons why mid-level management at the nation's
intelligence agencies is suffering from declining numbers and poor
performance.

Nolte envisages a mid-career training institution within the university
that would bring together analysts from all the nation's intelligence
agencies. "After they finish their training," he said, "one option ...
would be that they become 'free agents,' able to return to their 'home'
agency or to move on to another."

--

(Please send comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) 

Copyright (c) 2001-2005 United Press International



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn. 
Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to