America's Prisons: Breeding Grounds for Muslim Converts 

 

Ian Cuthbertson

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/homeland.php?id=568700

 

If I had to pick a single issue on which I would hope to see our
counter-terrorism policy give more focus to during 2007, it would be to have
real progress made in altering the mindsets, dynamics and structures in what
are rapidly emerging as a major source of domestic Islamist terrorism,
America's prisons and jails. 

 

Some progress has already been made. Federal prison authorities and state
authorities in larger jurisdictions have been fairly proactive in isolating
suspected terrorists and known radical Islamists from the general inmate
population. But more has to be done to stop prison authorities from
continuing to condone a well-established propensity for Muslims inmates to
self-segregate. 

 

As controls in the US on the access of outside Imams to prisoners have
tightened, the problem of Islamist radicalization in US prisons is one that
involves much more self-radicalization. This seems to be especially the case
amongst certain segments of the African-American inmate population that has
converted to Islam while in prison. 

 

It is notable that one of the more serious Jihadist terrorist plots,
uncovered in Los Angeles by local law enforcement and the FBI, involved just
such individuals. It is my strong belief that this is a specific area of
counter-terrorism policy where relatively little effort on the part of
federal, state and local authorities could have a disproportionately
positive impact on our security. Much closer attention needs to be given to
identifying, tracking and redirecting the types of inmates; those who are
disproportionately drawn from minority communities, and who most closely
parallel the angry and alienated Muslim immigrant youths who provide the
foot soldiers for Islamist terrorists in Europe. 

 

Such individuals and groups need to be treated in the same way we track
other inmate factions, in particular prison gangs. For American prison
authorities, this would be a much easier task than it is for their European
counter-parts, as they can more easily surmount the language and cultural
problems that be-devil such efforts in Europe.  It is a matter of
consciously making the effort to focus on the issue and to allocate the
staff and resources necessary to address properly the threat such inmates,
both individually and collectively, pose to the security of Americans, not
while they are incarcerated, but after they regain their freedom. 

 

However, I see no willingness yet to devote the kind of time, money and
trained staff necessary to seriously tackle this extremely dangerous
problem.  Unfortunately, given the nature of our complex and decentralized
prison system, such resources are only likely to materialize after a
large-scale terrorist attack that involves just these types of
self-radicalized, American Muslim converts. We continue in the face of this
clearly emerging threat to be reactive, not proactive, in our approach to
tackling the very real risks that arise as Islamic radicalization spreads
amongst American-born minority inmates in prisons and jails. The reality is
that attitudes to dealing with the problem are not evolving as quickly as
the threat. It is a common difficulty, one that crops up continually in
trying to get anything done across our entire counter-terrorist strategy.

 

FamilySecurityMatters.org <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/index.php>
Contributing Editor Ian Cuthbertson is an expert on European military
affairs and trans-Atlantic security issues, the Director of the
Counter-Terrorism Project at the World Policy Institute, and an adjunct
professor at the New School.

 

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to