http://www.mg.co.za/articlepage.aspx?area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__nati onal/ <http://www.mg.co.za/articlepage.aspx?area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__nat ional/&articleid=324559> &articleid=324559 SA responds to US in UN rape resolution row <http://banner.coza.com/transpix.gif> Johannesburg, South Africa <http://banner.coza.com/transpix.gif>
<http://banner.coza.com/transpix.gif> <http://banner.coza.com/transpix.gif> <http://banner.coza.com/transpix.gif> 10 November 2007 09:46 <http://banner.coza.com/transpix.gif> South African diplomats have expressed shock at strong United States government criticism of the country's stance over a United Nations resolution, introduced by the US, that condemns rape by governments and military formations. In an article in the New York Times on Thursday, the US accused South Africa of obstructing an American-drafted General Assembly resolution that would specifically condemn rape and sexual abuse used by governments and armed groups to achieve political and military objectives. While the resolution does not mention any countries by name, the Bush administration has cited accusations that rape is being employed by soldiers and militia members as a tactic for intimidation and warfare, notably in Sudan and Burma. "The South African position is shocking," said Kristen Silverberg, the assistant secretary of state for international organisation affairs, "given South Africa's long struggle against oppression." She noted that the Sout h African government takes a strong domestic position against sexual violence. Silverberg said the South Africans are demanding watered-down language that would make the resolution one about sexual violence in general rather than one about sexual violence sponsored by governments. "We think there is a real difference between governments that fail to prevent rape and governments that actively promote it, and we do not want the resolution to blur that difference," she told the newspaper. Asked about Silverberg's comments on South Africa's position, Baso Sangqu, the country's deputy ambassador, was quoted as saying: "I am shocked about that statement because we have been working very closely within the African group to find agreement on this resolution. "We are objecting to the resolution because it is politicised and singles out clear categories of rape. We want a resolution that is non-politicised and that looks at rape in a holistic manner in all its si tuations, including rape by soldiers in detention centres and in situations of foreign occupation." On Friday, South Africa's ambassador to the United Nations, Dumisani Kumalo, echoed Sangqu's comments. "As usual our US colleagues are being very disingenuous, because what they were trying to get us to do is to support a resolution only condemning rape by military and government institutions. We are saying we want to condemn rape in all its forms," said Kumalo, who is currently in South Africa. Kumalo said the US introduced the resolution about 10 days ago in a committee that dealt with humanitarian and social matters. "Rape is rape. We don't want rape to be dealt with selectively. It is a cruel and despicable crime. We said rape should be condemned in all its manifestations, that it does not matter if it's perpetrated by governments or individuals. The Africa group within the United Nations introduced our amendments. It was Angola who actually introduced them." Kumalo said the Africa group met the US delegation on Thursday night and drafted a resolution that is "now well-balanced, that condemns rape in all its manifestations including by governments and military formations". "The Africa group has persuaded the US to change the resolution," he said. -- Sapa [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
