> 

Hi Helene and all open-spacers out there!

After a long time of just lurking occasionally because of health trouble, I am 
back again.
Right now from Maputo/Mozambique.


You wrote:
> But nobody can guess what proportion may give a critical mass in each 
> different circonstances, and it would be vain to try how to control that!!!

I agree, but the question of the necessary  “proportion of critical mass” seems 
interesting and maybe observable in our practice of open space at whatever 
level and dimension. 
Maybe there are already some relevant findings in your collection of 
experiences, maybe you observe something interesting with regard to this 
question in actual practice.

Or maybe, as it often happens, the question could be refined in the light of 
what you observe(d); or even redefined; maybe it is not a question of 
“either/or"

I would be delighted to hear from you about this

Bernd





> On 10 Dec 2015, at 11:36, helene via OSList <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> thanks for all of this!
> we are trusting in unlimited love 
> so perhaps we don't like to get aware of our limits (= inner limits and/or OS 
> limits)
> 
> but indeed: if we invite very widely or even aim at "Trump-ists" and, for 
> instance, at a OS 50% of the participants happen to be,that sort of very new 
> participants, the spirit of OS perhaps have no chance to be really present, 
> so it will be no OS. So these persons wouldn't even imagine what is OS!
> But nobody can guess what proportion may give a critical mass in each 
> different circonstances, and it would be vain to try how to control that!!!
> 

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to