This discussion opened at a great time for me, as I am also working with a client that is making their first steps in making OKRs spread through the organization.
Adding to the wonderful advice from everyone, you can make a structure that invites the desired outcome. For example, at the open space designate three areas for conveners to work at. When it comes to defining the O's, there will be room for 3 O's to work on. I would discuss with the sponsor that there is always potential that participants will ask for an additional work area, or they might just create one for themselves. Also, that participants might finish working on one O, and move to the next Objective on their own accord. It will be a great opportunity to discuss the Open Space principles with the sponsor. In particular - whatever happens is the only thing that could happen. And sense from the discussion to what extent the sponsor is open for the emergence of the new and the unexpected. If s.he is not, maybe Open Space is not the right technique for that point in time? On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 01:15, Thomas Herrmann via OSList < oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote: > Dear Jake > > I don’t fully understand, of course, but am wondering what the > purpose/expected outcome is for this development process and also there > must be no more than 3 O’s? I understand they are not yet defined, but > should be identified/agreed on in the OST? > > My experience from similar situations is that it is not that well thought > through or that the opportunities at hand if choosing to use OST are not > fully understood. > > Good night from Sweden > > Thomas Herrmann > > > > *Från:* OSList <oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org> *För *Jake Yeager > via OSList > *Skickat:* den 5 februari 2020 00:57 > *Till:* World wide Open Space Technology email list < > oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> > *Kopia:* Jake Yeager <jacob.yea...@gmail.com> > *Ämne:* [OSList] From Open Space to objectives and key results (OKRs)? > > > > Hi folks, > > > > Anyone have experience using Open Space to develop OKRs with a group? > > > > I am facilitating an Open Space event in late February. I plan to use the > 25/10 Crowdsourcing method to prioritize draft objectives (O's) and then > 1-2-4-All to develop the key results (KR's) for each objective. > > > > The sponsor wants a maximum of 3 objectives. It might get a little hairy > if the clear cutoff for the 25/10 Crowdsourcing is greater than 3. Guess I > could use voting to narrow it down. Also, I am exploring if consent > decision-making could be useful. The sponsor might need to make a final > call on the top 3 if the group is split. > > > > Thanks and much love, > > Jake > > ________________ > > > > When the mind is quiet, the sun of your heart will shine once again, and > you will be free of problems. > > - Robert Adams <http://www.robert-adams.info/> > _______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > Past archives can be viewed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org -- Ilan Kirschenbaum - Co-Founder & Agile coach At Practical Agile LTD. Twitter: @kirschi_ Phone # +972-54-6620348 website: www.practical-agile.com <http://www.practical-agile.com> <http://practical-agile.com>
_______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
