I guess it depends on how the destination flag happened to be placed at that location.
If the user picked that spot from a map then osmand is doing exactly the right thing. I quite often put the destination point in the middle of a motorway, knowing that I can find my own way from there. If the user picked that building from an address search, then it definitely makes sense to end at a location with likely access to the building. On 3 October 2016 at 14:41, Poutnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 10/03/2016 03:30 PM, Jack Burke wrote: >> >> It looks like the on-ramp is closer to the building centroid than the >> parking_aisles are, so I'll guess that's the problem: it's trying to route >> you to the point nearest the centroid. >> >> Poutnik, in the U.S., it is illegal access. >> >> Since highway=motor* is defined to be assumed foot=no, bicycle=no, and a >> whole bunch of *=no, even if not explicitly tagged such, I don't see why >> parking=no and therefore "end my route here" can't be included. >> > > If by the ramp is meant highway=motorway_link, the car access is legal. > It is car routing, no pedestrian routing. > > An end of the route does not mean > the car stops and people go out. > > Otherwise there should be monitored > also all no car stop traffic signs, > where you cannot either par, either even stop. > > IMHO, finding a parking spot > is not job for routing. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Osmand" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
