But such motorcar=no for the highway applies only if there is a real restriction for the highway itself. Otherwise it is mapping for routing, what would be wrong.
As there are situations both highways are allowed and the barrier means just a barrier, not a highway access qualification. The eventual barrier access tags (should) just tell us, if the barrier is (conditionally) passable. Car routing should suppose bollards are implicitly not passable, same as walls. Note that both the original car-test BRouter profile http://brouter.de/brouter/profiles2/car-test.brf as well as my template for BRouter car profiles https://raw.githubusercontent.com/poutnikl/Car-Profile/master/Car-test-Template.brf considers bollards as not passable by default. On 01/03/2017 07:20 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
BushmanK wrote an interesting diary entry on the topic: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BushmanK/diary/39720 I think the OSM data should include a short way with "motorcar=no" to help routers understand that the way cannot be used by vehicles on 4 wheels. Please do not add access=no, as that would mean that pedestrians and cyclist cannot pas. --
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
