Hi Bob, This is probably not the best place for an OSM tagging discussion, however.....
> I've separately got an OSM change set being argued over on the road itself as > I don't believe its a "service road" Agreed it is not a service road. I guess it might have been at some point in its history, before being converted to shared pedestrian/cycle use. But not today. However you have changed it to highway=path, and thats probably a worse choice. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Path_examples shows that highway=path, on its own, is undesirable for routing. You could add foot=designated and bicycle=designated, and in theory that should work, but there is a better safer choice.... > since there's bollards at the turn into whitehall gardens and a > pedestrian/cycle shared use sign on the path itself. So think the answer is > change the tags/type of the "way" and it should be ok. Bollards and other engineering works mean it should be "highway=cycleway, foot=designated" (if it is primarily built to carry bikes) or "highway=footway, bicycle=designated" (if it is primarily built to carry feet). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
