I tested several apps a few years ago on my motorbike (TomTom, OsmAnd, 
Mapfactor, Sygic, Copilot). Most of these apps works by navigating multiple 
waypoints. Mapfactor is very good at this. 
Tomtom uses a track only. I always create gpx-files (track/route) on 
myrouteapp.com. Tomtom  is able to import these gpx-files and convert them 
to the tomtom-track format and sends it to the phone. Tomtom is able to 
navigate a track with navigation messages based on the streets. So it is 
possible.

I also think that navigating the track without calculation the route 
between points is the best option at this moment. 

Op zondag 7 juli 2019 08:08:47 UTC+2 schreef Bart Eisenberg:
>
> After a lot of experimenting, my thinking (for the moment) is this:
>
> OsmAnd, and other routing software too, is in the business of creating 
> efficient routes from point A to point B.  Perhaps via points C, D, ...  
> Whereas people who create GPXs are generally interested in trips that are 
> scenic rather than efficient: preferring smaller roads to highways, detours 
> to directness, and, in some cases, ending where they started. Your GPX 
> looks like that.  
>
> Ideally, one would import a scenic GPX route into OsmAnd, which would 
> create a route that duplicates it using OsmAnd map data. But the developers 
> have posted (on Github) that this is a tough problem to solve. I'm unaware 
> of any other GPS software that's solved it either: that takes a GPX from 
> another source and fully duplicates it with a route providing turn-by-turn, 
> road-by-road directions.  
>
> So for the foreseeable future, "navigating the track without calculating 
> the route between points" does seem like the best option. Following it 
> takes more concentration. So for safety sake, keep your eyes (mostly) on 
> the road.   
>
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 10:35:40 PM UTC-7, Peer wrote:
>>
>> Hello Bart,
>>
>> thanks for checking mt gpx route. I think it is normal that a calculated 
>> route is OSmAnd wil be different from the track on an imported gpx-file. 
>> The file is created in an other program thats probably uses different 
>> navigation settings. 
>>
>> I tried yesterday to create a route with OsmAnd alone, as Paul 
>> suggested.  I noticed that the intermediate points were shown by a flag on 
>> the map. After saving the track/route and reloading it the intermediate 
>> points were shown as a circle with a star in it. The imported gpx-file does 
>> not show symbols on the map for the route points. So there must be  a 
>> difference in the saved OsmAnd gpx-file and the imported gpx-file. Perhaps 
>> thats can be a cause for the routing problems. 
>>
>> Creating a route in OsmAnd was not easy at first. But after a while I got 
>> the hang of it. Creating a new intermediate point or a new destination 
>> works ok. In the beginning I made a lot of mistakes so I started again many 
>> times. For my purpose, creating a route (100km +) on smaller roads this 
>> method does not work very good. To get an overview I have to zoom out. But 
>> then the smaller roads are not displayed. So I have to zoom in to see the 
>> smaller roads again And the zooming in and out has to been done many times. 
>> OsmAnd also regarly moves the map back to the starting point which is 
>> inconvenient.  I find it difficult to place an intermediate point 
>> accurately. During experimenting I experienced that OsmAnd sometimes 
>> refuses to let me pass certain points and creates a detour. I do not know 
>> why. I saved a route and oepned it again. The I wanted to make some changes 
>> but I could not change te intermediate points (circle with star). Adding 
>> intermediate points at the end of the route did not work properly. I 
>> experienced similar strange route guidance as in my tests on the motorbike. 
>> I also found out that I was able to add a new destination to the saved 
>> route but I was not able to add a new intermediate point. I saw the flag on 
>> the screen but  this point was not part of the calculted route.
>> So my experience with adding intermedate points and new destination 
>> points in OsmAnd is not good. I think the experience will be much better 
>> when you create shorter routes.
>>
>> Navigating the track without calculating the route between point does 
>> work very good for me. I think that will the way I navigate tracks for the 
>> moment. But I hope there will be more progress in the future.
>> Thanks for the support!!
>> Peer
>>
>> Op zondag 7 juli 2019 01:28:10 UTC+2 schreef Bart Eisenberg:
>>>
>>> Correction: on closer inspection, my route, using "Calculate route 
>>> between points", varies in several places from your GPX, although it goes 
>>> in the general direction and gets the area of your screen capture right.  
>>> Sorry for the confusion.  
>>>
>>> On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 4:05:34 PM UTC-7, Bart Eisenberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here's a closeup of my routing near your screenshot:
>>>>
>>>> [image: Routing near Fluitenberg.png]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, July 1, 2019 at 4:43:39 AM UTC-7, Peer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I created a track with waypoints on MyRouteApp.com and saved it to the 
>>>>> tracks directory of OsmAnd.
>>>>> I choosed the track for navigating with the option 'Calculate route 
>>>>> between Points'.
>>>>>
>>>>> At first the navigating was fine. After approximately one hour OsmAnd 
>>>>> was starting to act strange when it should recalculate a route. The 
>>>>> recalculated as not logical.
>>>>> example 1:
>>>>> I should take a turn right into a side street. But OsmAnd wants me to 
>>>>> go straight ahead, make a u-turn on a roundabout 200 meters further and 
>>>>> then make a left turn into the side straat. 
>>>>> example 2: I have to drive straight ahead. But Osmand wants me to turn 
>>>>> right into a side street, make a uturn after 100meters and then turn 
>>>>> right 
>>>>> again to follow the orginal route.
>>>>>
>>>>> This happened several times, always when recalculating a route. I do 
>>>>> not know if this is problem in OsmAnd (version 3.3.8) or that my phone 
>>>>> (Samsung trend, 6 years old) is just not strong enough for performing 
>>>>> this 
>>>>> calculations.
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/7cefe859-acd8-409b-8554-6666f3f82dc8%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to